Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en el implante de dispositivos cardiacos implantables y las activaciones de la monitorización a distancia / Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices and remote monitoring activations

Introducción y objetivos La monitorización a distancia (MD) de los dispositivos cardiacos implantables (DCI) se considera más fiable, eficiente y segura que los convencionales seguimientos presenciales, aunque su implantación es aún subóptima. Este estudio pretende analizar el impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en las tasas de implantes y activaciones de MD de DCI en España. Métodos Se utilizó el Registro COVID-19 de MD en España para analizar el número mensual de todos los implantes de DCI y activaciones de MD desde enero de 2018 hasta diciembre de 2021 en España. Se sumaron los datos de los 5 principales fabricantes de DCI y se analizaron de manera descriptiva. Resultados Se registró un total de 205.345 DCI. El número de implantes disminuyó bruscamente (48,2%) con el confinamiento (marzo a junio de 2020) y aumentó progresivamente después hasta compensar la reducción previa, excepto en marcapasos y desfibriladores automáticos implantables (DAI), con una pérdida agregada (2020-2021) del 7 y el 3%, respectivamente, respecto a la media anual. Aumentaron la terapia de resincronización cardiaca con desfibrilador (TRC-D, 17%) y con marcapasos (TRC-P, 4,5%) a los 2 años. El porcentaje de activaciones de MD aumentó del 24,5% en 2018 al 49,0% en 2021, con un fuerte aumento durante el confinamiento. Las tasas de activación de MD aumentaron invariablemente durante el confinamiento con todos los dispositivos: marcapasos (el 14,4 frente al 37,2%; p<0,001); DAI (el 75,6 frente al 94,2%; p<0,001); TRC-D/TRC-P (del 68,6/44,2% al 81,6/61%; p<0,001), y Holters implantables (el 50,2 frente al 68,7%; p<0,001). Conclusiones La significativa reducción de los implantes que se produjo durante el confinamiento se recuperó gradualmente después, excepto los de marcapasos y DAI. La pandemia de COVID-19 impulsó la MD de todos los DCI en España. (AU)

Introduction and objectives Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is considered more reliable, efficient, and safer than conventional in-person follow-up. However, the implementation of RM is still suboptimal. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of CIED implants and RM activations in Spain. Methods The COVID-19 RM Spain Registry was used to analyze the monthly number of all CIED implantations and RM activations from January 2018 to December 2021. A descriptive analysis was performed using aggregated data from the five major CIED manufacturers. Results A total of 205 345 CIEDs were recorded. The number of implants decreased sharply (48.2%) during the pandemic lockdown (March-June 2020) but gradually increased thereafter, compensating for the previous reduction. However, pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) showed an aggregate loss of 7% and 3%, respectively, from the annual average during 2020-2021. In contrast, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) increased by 17%, and pacemakers (CRT-P) by 4.5% over the 2-year period. The percentage of RM activations increased from 24.5% in 2018 to 49.0% in 2021, with a sharp increase during the lockdown. The RM activation rates consistently increased during the lockdown for all devices: pacemakers (14.4% vs 37.2%; P<.001); ICD (75.6% vs 94.2%; P<.001); CRT-D/CRT-P (68.6-44.2% vs 81.6-61%; P<.001), and implantable loop recorders (50.2% vs 68.7%; P<.001). Conclusions The significant decline in implants during the lockdown gradually recovered, except for pacemakers and ICD. However, the COVID-19 pandemic boosted RM for all CIEDs in Spain. (AU)

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices and remote monitoring activations.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is considered more reliable, efficient, and safer than conventional in-person follow-up. However, the implementation of RM is still suboptimal. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of CIED implants and RM activations in Spain. METHODS: The COVID-19 RM Spain Registry was used to analyze the monthly number of all CIED implantations and RM activations from January 2018 to December 2021. A descriptive analysis was performed using aggregated data from the five major CIED manufacturers. RESULTS: A total of 205 345 CIEDs were recorded. The number of implants decreased sharply (48.2%) during the pandemic lockdown (March-June 2020) but gradually increased thereafter, compensating for the previous reduction. However, pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) showed an aggregate loss of 7% and 3%, respectively, from the annual average during 2020-2021. In contrast, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) increased by 17%, and pacemakers (CRT-P) by 4.5% over the 2-year period. The percentage of RM activations increased from 24.5% in 2018 to 49.0% in 2021, with a sharp increase during the lockdown. The RM activation rates consistently increased during the lockdown for all devices: pacemakers (14.4% vs 37.2%; P <.001); ICD (75.6% vs 94.2%; P <.001); CRT-D/CRT-P (68.6-44.2% vs 81.6-61%; P <.001), and implantable loop recorders (50.2% vs 68.7%; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant decline in implants during the lockdown gradually recovered, except for pacemakers and ICD. However, the COVID-19 pandemic boosted RM for all CIEDs in Spain.

Registro español de marcapasos. XX informe oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2022) / Spanish pacemaker registry. 20th official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2022)

Introducción y objetivos: En este informe se comunica la actividad de estimulación cardiaca en 2022: número total de implantes, adherencia a la monitorización a distancia, factores demográficos y clínicos y características del material implantado. Métodos: Las fuentes de información son la plataforma CardioDispositivos, la tarjeta europea del paciente portador de marcapasos y los datos facilitados por los fabricantes. Resultados: Las tasas de marcapasos convencionales y resincronizadores de baja energía fueron de 866 y 34 unidades/millón respectivamente. Se implantaron 815 marcapasos sin cables. Se registraron 16.426 procedimientos de 82 hospitales (9.407 a través de CardioDispositivos), lo que supone un 40% de la actividad. La media de edad fue 78,6 años, con predominio de varones (60,3%). El bloqueo auriculoventricular fue el trastorno más frecuente y el 14,5% de los pacientes estaban en fibrilación auricular. Predomina el modo de estimulación DDD/R (55,6%) y la edad influye en el modo de estimulación, de forma que más de un tercio de los pacientes mayores de 80 años en ritmo sinusal recibieron estimulación monocameral en ventrículo. Se incluyeron en monitorización a distancia el 35% de los marcapasos y el 55% de los resincronizadores de baja energía. Conclusiones: Aumentan en un 5,6% el número de marcapasos convencionales, un 16% los resincronizadores de baja energía y un 25% los marcapasos sin cables. Se estabiliza la adherencia a la monitorización a distancia. Aumenta en un 11% el número de procedimientos incluidos en CardioDispositivos, aunque disminuye el volumen de muestra. El uso extensivo de la plataforma es lo que permitirá en años venideros contar con un registro de calidad.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: This article reports the cardiac pacing activity performed in 2022, including the total number of implants, adherence to remote monitoring, demographic and clinical factors, and the characteristics of the implanted devices. Methods: The information sources were the CardioDispositivos online platform, the European pacemaker patient identification card, and data provided by the manufacturers. Results: The rates of conventional pacemakers and low-energy resynchronizers were 866 and 34 units per million population, respectively. A total of 815 leadless pacemakers were implanted. In all, 16426 procedures performed in 82 hospitals were reported (9407 through CardioDispositivos), representing 40% of the activity. The mean age was 78.6 years, with a predominance of men (60.3%). The most frequent disorder was atrioventricular block, and 14.5% of the patients had atrial fibrillation. There was a predominance of the DDD/R pacing mode (55.6%), and pacing mode was influenced by age, such that more than one-third of patients older than 80 years in sinus rhythm received single-chamber ventricular pacing. The remote monitoring program included 35% of conventional pacemakers and 55% of low-energy resynchronization pacemakers. Conclusions: The number of conventional pacemakers increased by 5.6%, low-energy resynchronizers by 16%, and leadless pacemakers by 25%. Adherence to remote monitoring was stable. The number of procedures included in CardioDispositivos increased by 11%, although the sample volume decreased. In the coming years, the widespread use of the platform will likely lead to a high-quality registry.(AU)

Spanish pacemaker registry. 20th official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2022).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This article reports the cardiac pacing activity performed in 2022, including the total number of implants, adherence to remote monitoring, demographic and clinical factors, and the characteristics of the implanted devices. METHODS: The information sources were the CardioDispositivos online platform, the European pacemaker patient identification card, and data provided by the manufacturers. RESULTS: The rates of conventional pacemakers and low-energy resynchronizers were 866 and 34 units per million population, respectively. A total of 815 leadless pacemakers were implanted. In all, 16426 procedures performed in 82 hospitals were reported (9407 through CardioDispositivos), representing 40% of the activity. The mean age was 78.6 years, with a predominance of men (60.3%). The most frequent disorder was atrioventricular block, and 14.5% of the patients had atrial fibrillation. There was a predominance of the DDD/R pacing mode (55.6%), and pacing mode was influenced by age, such that more than one-third of patients older than 80 years in sinus rhythm received single-chamber ventricular pacing. The remote monitoring program included 35% of conventional pacemakers and 55% of low-energy resynchronization pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS: The number of conventional pacemakers increased by 5.6%, low-energy resynchronizers by 16%, and leadless pacemakers by 25%. Adherence to remote monitoring was stable. The number of procedures included in CardioDispositivos increased by 11%, although the sample volume decreased. In the coming years, the widespread use of the platform will likely lead to a high-quality registry.

Spanish pacemaker registry. 19th official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2021).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This document includes cardiac pacing activity performed in Spain in 2021: figures for implanted devices, demographic and clinical factors, characteristics of the implanted material, and remote monitoring data. METHODS: The European Pacemaker Patient Card, the CardioDispositivos.es online platform, the centers' own databases and the data provided by the supplier companies are used as sources of information. RESULTS: 17.360 procedures were registered from 95 hospitals, which represents 43% of the activity. The implantation rates of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers were 822 and 31 units per million population, respectively. 652 leadless pacemakers were implanted. The mean age of implantation is high (78.8 years), and atrioventricular block is the most frequent electrocardiographic abnormality. Dual-chamber pacing mode predominated, nonetheless single-chamber pacing was performed in 19% of patients in sinus rhythm, mainly in the elderly. 28.5% of implanted conventional pacemakers and 56,2% of low-energy resynchronization pacemakers were included in the remote monitoring program. CONCLUSIONS: In 2021 the number of conventional pacemakers increased by 8.3% and resynchronizers by 18.9%, despite the decrease in low-energy resynchronization, probably attributable to the development of physiological pacing. Leadless pacemakers increased by 25%. The expansion of remote monitoring continued, consolidating as a fundamental follow-up method.

Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 18th Official Report of the Cardiac Pacing Section of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2020).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes the cardiac pacing activity performed in Spain in 2020, including the number and type of implanted devices, demographic and clinical factors, and data on remote monitoring. METHODS: Information consisted of the European Pacemaker Patient Card, data submitted to the cardiodispositivos.es online platform, the databases of participating centers, and supplier-reported data. RESULTS: A total of 14 662 procedures were registered from 102 hospitals, representing 39.2% of the estimated activity. The implantation rates of conventional and low-energy resynchronization pacemakers were 759 and 31 units per million population, respectively. In all, 520 leadless pacemakers were implanted, 70 with atrioventricular synchrony. The mean age at implantation was high (78.8 years), and the most frequent electrocardiographic change was atrioventricular block. There was a predominance of dual-chamber pacing mode but VVI/R single-chamber pacing was used in 19% of patients in sinus rhythm, depending on age and sex. Remote monitoring capability was present in 18.5% of implanted conventional pacemakers and 45.6% of low-energy resynchronization pacemakers, although registration in this system increased by 53% in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: In 2020, in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the number of implanted conventional pacemakers decreased by 8% and cardiac resynchronization therapy by 4.6%. The number of leadless pacemakers increased by 16.5%. Sequential pacing was predominant, influenced by age and sex. Home monitoring played a fundamental role as a mode of follow-up in this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic year.

Registro Español de Marcapasos. XVII Informe Oficial de la Sección de Estimulación Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2019) / Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 17th Official Report of the Section on Cardiac Pacing of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2019)

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Se describe la actividad realizada en España en estimulación cardiaca durante 2019: cuantía y tipo de dispositivos, factores demográficos y clínicos. MÉTODOS: Se analiza la información aportada por la tarjeta europea del paciente portador de marcapasos, los datos incluidos en la plataforma online cardiodispositivos.es y la información remitida por empresas proveedoras sobre el número total de dispositivos. RESULTADOS: Se registran 15.833 procedimientos de 102 centros implantadores, lo que representa el 39% de la actividad total estimada. La tasa de implante de generadores de marcapasos convencionales es de 832 unidades/millón y la de resincronizadores de baja energía, 32 unidades/millón. Se implantaron 431 marcapasos sin cables. Predomina el implante en pacientes de edad avanzada (media, 78,7 años). Los electrodos utilizados son principalmente bipolares y de fijación activa y el 34,1% son compatibles con resonancia magnética. El bloqueo auriculoventricular es la alteración electrocardiográfica más frecuente y predomina la estimulación secuencial bicameral, a pesar de lo cual hasta un 20% de los pacientes en ritmo sinusal reciben un marcapasos monocameral en ventrículo, fundamentalmente mayores de 80 años y mujeres. Se incluyen en monitorización a distancia el 41% de los resincronizadores de baja energía y el 14,8% de los marcapasos convencionales. CONCLUSIONES: En 2019ha aumentado el consumo de generadores de estimulación cardiaca en un 1,6%, sobre todo los resincronizadores de baja energía, que aumentan en un 15,1%. Predomina la estimulación secuencial, influida por la edad y el sexo. Aumenta en un 20,6% la monitorización a distancia de pacientes con resincronización cardiaca con marcapasos y continúa siendo escasa la de los marcapasos convencionales

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes Spanish cardiac pacing activity during 2019: quantities and types of devices and demographic and clinical factors. METHODS: The analysis is based on data obtained from the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card, data submitted to the online platform cardiodispositivos.es, and supplier-reported data on the total number of implanted pacemakers. RESULTS: Information was received on 15 833 procedures from 102 implantation centers, representing 39% of the estimated total activity. The implantation rates of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers were 832 and 32 units per million population, respectively. A total of 431 leadless pacemakers were implanted. Most implantations were performed in elderly patients (mean age, 78.7 years). Most electrodes were bipolar and with active fixation and 34.1% were magnetic resonance imaging-compatible. Atrioventricular block was the most common electrocardiographic abnormality. Dual-chamber sequential pacing predominated; nonetheless, up to 20% of patients in sinus rhythm received a single-chamber ventricular pacemaker, mainly those older than 80 years of age and women. Remote monitoring capability was present in 41% of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and in 14.8% of conventional pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of pacing generators increased by 1.6%, mainly due to a 15.1% increase in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Sequential pacing predominates; its use is influenced by age and sex. Remote monitoring increased by 20.6% in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and continues to be scarce in conventional pacemakers

Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 17th Official Report of the Section on Cardiac Pacing of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2019).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes Spanish cardiac pacing activity during 2019: quantities and types of devices and demographic and clinical factors. METHODS: The analysis is based on data obtained from the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card, data submitted to the online platform cardiodispositivos.es, and supplier-reported data on the total number of implanted pacemakers. RESULTS: Information was received on 15 833 procedures from 102 implantation centers, representing 39% of the estimated total activity. The implantation rates of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers were 832 and 32 units per million population, respectively. A total of 431 leadless pacemakers were implanted. Most implantations were performed in elderly patients (mean age, 78.7 years). Most electrodes were bipolar and with active fixation and 34.1% were magnetic resonance imaging-compatible. Atrioventricular block was the most common electrocardiographic abnormality. Dual-chamber sequential pacing predominated; nonetheless, up to 20% of patients in sinus rhythm received a single-chamber ventricular pacemaker, mainly those older than 80 years of age and women. Remote monitoring capability was present in 41% of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and in 14.8% of conventional pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of pacing generators increased by 1.6%, mainly due to a 15.1% increase in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. Sequential pacing predominates; its use is influenced by age and sex. Remote monitoring increased by 20.6% in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and continues to be scarce in conventional pacemakers.

Registro Español de Marcapasos. XVI Informe Oficial de la Sección de Estimulación Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2018) / Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 16th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2018)

Introducción y objetivos: Se describe el resultado del análisis de los dispositivos de estimulación implantados y remitidos al Registro Español de Marcapasos en 2018. Métodos: Información que aporta la Tarjeta Europea del Paciente Portador de Marcapasos, así como los datos proporcionados por la industria sobre el número total de dispositivos implantados. Resultados: Se recibió información de 90 centros hospitalarios, con un total de 12.148 tarjetas, lo cual supone un 31% de la actividad total estimada. El consumo de generadores convencionales y de dispositivos de resincronización fue de 825 y 77 unidades por millón de habitantes respectivamente. La media de edad de los pacientes que recibieron un implante fue 78,3 años y un 54% de los dispositivos se implantaron en pacientes mayores de 80 años. El 77,1% de los procedimientos fueron primoimplantes y el 21,6%, recambios de generador. Aunque la estimulación secuencial bicameral sigue siendo mayoritaria, se utiliza menos en pacientes mayores de 80 años y en mujeres. Además, al 28% de los pacientes con enfermedad del nódulo sinusal y el 24,7% de aquellos con bloqueo auriculoventricular se los estimula en modo VVI/R pese a estar en ritmo sinusal. Conclusiones: El consumo total de generadores de marcapasos en España ha aumentado en un 1,2% con respecto al año 2017, fundamentalmente a expensas del aumento del consumo de generadores de terapia de resincronización cardiaca con marcapasos (8,7%). Los factores directamente relacionados con la elección del modo de estimulación son la edad y el sexo

Introduction and objectives: This report describes the result of the analysis of the implanted pacemakers reported to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2018. Methods: The analysis is based on the information provided by the European Pacemaker Identification Card and supplier-reported data on the overall number of implanted pacemakers. Results: Information was received from 90 hospitals, with a total of 12 148 cards, representing 31% of the estimated activity. Use of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers was 825 and 77 units per million people, respectively. The mean age of the patients receiving an implant was 78.3 years, and 54% of the devices were implanted in people aged> 80 years. A total of 77.1% were first implants and 21.6% corresponded to generator exchanges. Bicameral sequential pacing was the most frequent pacing mode but was less frequently used in patients aged> 80 years and in women. Single chamber VVI/R pacing was used in 28% of patients with sick sinus syndrome and in 24.7% of those with atrioventricular block, despite being in sinus rhythm. Conclusions: The total consumption of pacemaker generators in Spain increased by 1.2% compared with 2017, mainly due to an 8.7% increase in cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker generators. Selection of pacing mode was directly influenced by age and sex

Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 16th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2018).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes the result of the analysis of the implanted pacemakers reported to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2018. METHODS: The analysis is based on the information provided by the European Pacemaker Identification Card and supplier-reported data on the overall number of implanted pacemakers. RESULTS: Information was received from 90 hospitals, with a total of 12 148 cards, representing 31% of the estimated activity. Use of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers was 825 and 77 units per million people, respectively. The mean age of the patients receiving an implant was 78.3 years, and 54% of the devices were implanted in people aged> 80 years. A total of 77.1% were first implants and 21.6% corresponded to generator exchanges. Bicameral sequential pacing was the most frequent pacing mode but was less frequently used in patients aged> 80 years and in women. Single chamber VVI/R pacing was used in 28% of patients with sick sinus syndrome and in 24.7% of those with atrioventricular block, despite being in sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: The total consumption of pacemaker generators in Spain increased by 1.2% compared with 2017, mainly due to an 8.7% increase in cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker generators. Selection of pacing mode was directly influenced by age and sex.

Registro Español de Marcapasos. XV Informe Oficial de la Sección de Estimulación Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2017) / Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 15th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2017)

Introducción y objetivos: Se describen e interpretan los datos del Registro Español de Marcapasos referentes a la actividad de estimulación cardiaca llevada a cabo en España en 2017. Métodos: Se analiza la información aportada por la Tarjeta Europea del Paciente Portador de Marcapasos y la información remitida por la industria sobre el número total de dispositivos implantados. Resultados: Se recibe información de 106 centros implantadores, con un total de 12.672 tarjetas europeas, el 32,1% de la actividad total estimada. La tasa de implante de generadores de marcapasos convencionales es de 820 unidades/millón y la de terapia de resincronización cardiaca de baja energía, 26 unidades/millón. Se implantan 333 marcapasos sin cables. La media de edad al implante es 77,9 años, la mayoría en varones (58,5%). Se utilizan mayoritariamente electrodos bipolares y de fijación activa, y tan solo un 20% son compatibles con resonancia magnética. El bloqueo auriculoventricular es la alteración electrocardiográfica más frecuente. A pesar del predominio de la estimulación secuencial bicameral (55%), hasta un 21,8% de los pacientes en ritmo sinusal reciben un marcapasos VVI/R. Los pacientes mayores de 80 años son los que menos se benefician de la estimulación fisiológica y de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca de baja energía. Conclusiones: El consumo total de generadores de marcapasos en España se mantiene en cifras similares a las de 2016. La edad es el principal factor que condiciona el modo de estimulación, que podría optimizarse en cerca del 22% de los pacientes. Continúa en ascenso la implantación del marcapasos sin cables

Introduction and objectives: This report describes the data reported to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry concerning the activity in cardiac pacing in 2017 in Spain. Methods: The analysis is based on the data obtained from the European Pacemaker Identification Card and the information reported by supplier companies related to global number of implanted pacemakers. Results: Information was received from 106 hospitals, with a total of 12672 cards, representing the 32.1% of the total pacing activity. Conventional pacemaker and resynchronization pacemaker rate was 820 units/million and 26 units/million inhabitants respectively. A total of 333 leadless pacemakers were implanted. The mean age was 77.9 years, predominantly men (58.5%). Most electrodes were bipolar, with active fixation and only 20% had magnetic resonance protection. Atrioventricular block was the most common electrocardiographic disturb. Most patients received bicameral sequential pacing although single chamber VVIR pacing was used in up to 21.8% of patients. Patients older than 80 years benefited less from physiological pacing and resynchronization therapy. Conclusions: Total use of pacemaker generators remains stable with respect to 2016. Age is the main factor that influences pacing mode selection, which could be improved in around 22% of patients. Leadless pacing continues to rise

Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 15th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2017).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes the data reported to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry concerning the activity in cardiac pacing in 2017 in Spain. METHODS: The analysis is based on the data obtained from the European Pacemaker Identification Card and the information reported by supplier companies related to global number of implanted pacemakers. RESULTS: Information was received from 106 hospitals, with a total of 12672 cards, representing the 32.1% of the total pacing activity. Conventional pacemaker and resynchronization pacemaker rate was 820 units/million and 26 units/million inhabitants respectively. A total of 333 leadless pacemakers were implanted. The mean age was 77.9 years, predominantly men (58.5%). Most electrodes were bipolar, with active fixation and only 20% had magnetic resonance protection. Atrioventricular block was the most common electrocardiographic disturb. Most patients received bicameral sequential pacing although single chamber VVIR pacing was used in up to 21.8% of patients. Patients older than 80 years benefited less from physiological pacing and resynchronization therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Total use of pacemaker generators remains stable with respect to 2016. Age is the main factor that influences pacing mode selection, which could be improved in around 22% of patients. Leadless pacing continues to rise.

Selección de lo mejor del año 2017 en estimulación cardiaca: resonancia magnética en pacientes portadores de marcapasos y desfibriladores / Selection of the best of 2017 on cardiac pacing: magnetic resonance in patients with pacemaker and implantable defibrillator

No disponible

Registro Español de Marcapasos. XIV Informe Oficial de la Sección de Estimulación Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2016) / Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 14th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2016)

Introducción y objetivos: Se describe el resultado del análisis de los dispositivos de estimulación implantados y remitidos al Registro Español de Marcapasos en 2016. Métodos: Procesado de la información que aporta la Tarjeta Europea del Paciente Portador de Marcapasos. Resultados: Se recibió información de 115 centros hospitalarios, con un total de 12.697 tarjetas, el 32,3% de la actividad estimada. El consumo de generadores convencionales y dispositivos de resincronización fue de 818 y 79 unidades por millón habitantes respectivamente. Se implantaron 200 marcapasos sin cables. La media de edad de los pacientes que recibieron un implante fue 77,8 años y un 52% de los dispositivos se implantaron en mayores de 80 años. El 74,9% de los procedimientos fueron primoimplantes y el 23,4%, recambios de generador. Los cables endocavitarios utilizados fueron bipolares, el 82,9% con sistema de fijación activa y el 16,1% compatibles con resonancia magnética. Aunque la estimulación secuencial bicameral sigue siendo mayoritaria, se estimula en modo VVI(R) al 26,7% de los pacientes con enfermedad del nódulo sinusal y el 23,8% de aquellos con bloqueo auriculoventricular pese a estar en ritmo sinusal. Conclusiones: El consumo total de generadores de marcapasos en España ha aumentado en un 1,6% con respecto a 2015. La mayoría de los cables implantados son de fijación activa y menos del 20% tiene protección para la resonancia magnética. Los factores directamente relacionados con la elección del modo de estimulación son la edad y el sexo. En alrededor del 32% de los casos podría mejorarse la elección del modo de estimulación (AU)

Introduction and objectives: This report describes the results of analysis of implanted pacemakers reported to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Methods: The analysis was based on information provided by the European Pacemaker Identification Card. Results: Information was received from 115 hospitals, with a total of 12 697 cards, representing 32.3% of the estimated activity. Use of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers was 818 and 79 units per million inhabitants, respectively. A total of 200 leadless pacemakers were implanted. The mean age of the patients receiving an implant was 77.8 years, and 52% of devices were implanted in persons older than 80 years. In all, 74.9% were first implants and 23.4% corresponded to generator exchange. Endocardial leads were bipolar, 82.9% with active fixation, and 16.1% had magnetic resonance imaging protection. Most patients received bicameral sequential pacing, although single chamber pacing VVI(R) was used in 26.7% of the patients with sick sinus syndrome and in 23.8% of those with atrioventricular block, despite sinus rhythm. Conclusions: Total use of pacemaker generators in Spain has increased by 1.6% compared with 2015. Most implanted leads have active fixation and less than 20% have magnetic resonance imaging protection. Age and sex directly influenced pacing mode selection, which could be improved in around 32% of patients (AU)

Spanish Pacemaker Registry. 14th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2016).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report describes the results of analysis of implanted pacemakers reported to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry. METHODS: The analysis was based on information provided by the European Pacemaker Identification Card. RESULTS: Information was received from 115 hospitals, with a total of 12 697 cards, representing 32.3% of the estimated activity. Use of conventional and resynchronization pacemakers was 818 and 79 units per million inhabitants, respectively. A total of 200 leadless pacemakers were implanted. The mean age of the patients receiving an implant was 77.8 years, and 52% of devices were implanted in persons older than 80 years. In all, 74.9% were first implants and 23.4% corresponded to generator exchange. Endocardial leads were bipolar, 82.9% with active fixation, and 16.1% had magnetic resonance imaging protection. Most patients received bicameral sequential pacing, although single chamber pacing VVI(R) was used in 26.7% of the patients with sick sinus syndrome and in 23.8% of those with atrioventricular block, despite sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Total use of pacemaker generators in Spain has increased by 1.6% compared with 2015. Most implanted leads have active fixation and less than 20% have magnetic resonance imaging protection. Age and sex directly influenced pacing mode selection, which could be improved in around 32% of patients.

Selección de lo mejor del año 2016 en estimulación cardiaca: estimulación sin cables / Selection of the best of 2016 on cardiac pacing: leadless pacing

No disponible

Selección de lo mejor del año 2016 en terapia de resincronización cardiaca / Selection of the best of 2016 on cardiac pacing

No disponible